Fahrenheit 451 Analysis Essay

The theme of Ray Bradburys classic Fahrenheit 451 potbelly be viewed from some(prenominal) different angles. First and foremost, the sacred scripture gives an anti- security review message. Bradbury understood censorship to be a natural outcropping of an too tolerant hostelry. Yet, the maven Guy Montag is angiotensin converting enzyme of the few that is courageous enough to find out the honor for himself. This unexpected disc all overy on the corruption of beau monde challenged traditional values, association and beliefs. The personal freedom to the practiced of an individual having the freedom of expression when he utilizes the electric receptacle of censorship in Fahrenheit 451.In Bradburys novel, nine has evolved to such an extreme that all publications is illegal to possess. Be pull in of the trouble volumes may cause, they were banned altogether. For example, one group dexterity think they had a rightfully great idea and wrote it in a book, however, the some ot her group might object to something that has been written, that means the book will have to be modified and then censorship begins. Soon, a nonher group objects to something else in the book, and it is once again edited, eventually the original product will be lost.Because of this presented danger, no longer can books be read, non only when when because they might offend someone, exclusively because books devise questions for the pile that the politics cannot answer. The intellectual thinking that comes from k immediatelyledge can often be dangerous, yet, who would requisite to do that when they can take the easy route? Ignorance is rapture applies perfectly here. The government would rather rule the passel orderly than have them start a whirling with knowledge. This philosophy, according to the book, completely ignores the benefits of knowledge. True, knowledge can cause disharmony because it causes state to ask why, only if in many ways, knowledge of the past, which is recorded in books, can prevent mankind from making interchangeable mistakes in the present and future.The society envisioned in Fahrenheit 451 is corrupted. As Captain Beatty explains, government apply of peoples works there was not a conspiracy of dictators, but a consensus of everyday people instead. The citizens be so weak-minded that they dont want to think for themselves and solve the troubling problems of the universe. They dont have much emotion, because they prefer pleasure over hurt. The only way they can do this is to not care. The parlor women, for example, cannot see past the surface. They are more interested in looks than reality they are so shallow that they cannot see ones align qualities. It is far easier to live a emotional state of concealment and a life where engineering will render you with all necessities. Yet more importantly, Fahrenheit 451 set forth the people in that society as anti-social.Clarisse, the only normal girl mentioned that people in that society doesnt talk much, at all. They are any shouting or dancing around deal wild (30), but the key point is, people dont talk about anything (31), they pee-pee a lot of cars or clothes or swimming pools mostly and secernate how swell (31) They do not quite live in the reality, only using abstract things to entertain themselves. They all say the same things and nobody says anything different (31) because in their eyes, technology and the government is always correct. This is very similar to our world today, almost everyone some kind of technology television, computer, give-up the ghost held devices. When we have a choice between technology or nature. It is almost certain that technology wins. We are on the computer three to four hours a day, doing work, checking email, social media, or just simply glide the web. Our everyday life is technology we wager on it so much that it is almost impossible to live without it.People in the novel are terror-struck of themselves , of what their minds are capable of doing. They fear the thought of knowing, which leads them to depend on others, such as technology and the government to think for them. The best example would be the protagonist Guy Montag. His entire view on life shifted as the book progressed. He was originally a normal fireman, but when he met his neighbor Clarisse McClennen, who was considered a misfit in the society, he began to see things differently. Instead of tan books because its useless information to the public, he now wants to share its knowledge with the whole world. Montag is at contend with the society, hes battling against the common knowledge and laws, laborious to shine some light on the people.Thus, the book successfully advocates the idea that men should think for themselves, not let technology or any alfresco sources decide for them. Technology may provide you with joy, but to live life to the fullest, you have to try everything, and there are no substitute for the treas ure you can find in books. Its like Montag said, I went around doing one thing and feeling another. (131) as he reflects on all the trouble that he has gotten into because he has not been true to himself. Although this path might not be easy, it is necessary for any society that doesnt wish to repeat the mistakes of the past to do knowledge. Our society today needs to realize that sooner it is too late.